CO129-214 - Public Offices & Others - 1883 — Page 72

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

68

Office point out in their letter of the 2th instant, that the Service Regulation referred to in Mr Shaw Lefevre's letter of the 15th ultimo has reference to Cables which are laid between the Territories of two contracting States and, do not mention the case of a Cable laid between the Territory of a Contracting state and that of a non-contracting State but the Service Regulation in question does not interfere with the liberty of any State to lay down such conditions as may appear to it to be reasonable; and I am of opinion that the condition to which I have referred is a reasonable one and ought to be imposed.

In every case I think it can be a matter of small hardship to the Company to submit to this condition seeing that they themselves say in their letter of the 27th ultimo they already adopt the rules of the Telegraph Convention, throughout their system. Cables which have been laid in the past of course the condition cannot now be imposed, but for the future every Company should in my opinion be treated alike and be required to submit to the condition.

The Great Northern Company adhere to the Convention & I am not aware that they claim to exclude any of their lines from the effect of the adhesion.

I have, &c.,

P Henry Maynard.

Edit History

2026-05-24 03:41:27 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
68 Office point out in their letter of the 2th instant, that the Service Regulation referred to in Mr Shaw Lefevre's letter of the 15th ultimo has reference to Cables which are laid between the Territories of two contracting States and, do not mention the case of a Cable laid between the Territory of a Contracting state and that of a non-contracting State but the Service Regulation in question does not interfere with the liberty of any State to lay down such conditions as may appear to it to be reasonable; and I am of opinion that the condition to which I have referred is a reasonable one and ought to be imposed. In every case I think it can be a matter of small hardship to the Company to submit to this condition seeing that they themselves say in their letter of the 27th ultimo they already adopt the rules of the Telegraph Convention, throughout their system. Cables which have been laid in the past of course the condition cannot now be imposed, but for the future every Company should in my opinion be treated alike and be required to submit to the condition. The Great Northern Company adhere to the Convention & I am not aware that they claim to exclude any of their lines from the effect of the adhesion. I have, &c., P Henry Maynard.
Baseline (Original)
68 Office point out in their letter of the 2th instant, that the Service Regulation referred to in Mr Shaw Lefevres letter of th the 15th ultimo has reference to Cables which are laid between the Territories of two contracting States and, dow not mention the Case of a Cable laid between the Sentory of a Contracting state and that of a non contracting State but the Since Regulation in question dow not intérefere with the liberty of any State to lay down such conditions. as may appear lo "it to be reasonable; and I am of opinion that the condition to which I have referred reasonable one and ought to 10 a be imposed IN can in Case every I think be a matter of small small hardship to the Company to submit to this condition seeing that as they the 2 27 th rules of themselves say in their letter of ultimo they already adopt the the Telegraph Convention, throughout their eyelom regardo system. Cables which have been As laid the past of course the condition carmel now be imposed, but for the future Every Company should in my opinion be treated alike and be required to submit to the condition The Great Northern Company adhere to the Convention & I am not aware that they claim لو to exclude any of their lines from the effect of the adhesion. I have, te, P Henry Jewalt.
2026-05-24 03:41:27 · Baseline
View content

68

Office point out in

their letter of the

2th instant, that the Service Regulation

referred to in Mr Shaw Lefevres letter of

th

the 15th ultimo has reference to Cables which

are

laid between the Territories of two contracting States and, dow not mention

the

Case

of

a Cable laid between the

Sentory of a Contracting state and that

of a

non

contracting State but the Since

Regulation in question dow not intérefere

with the liberty of any

State to lay

down such conditions.

as

may appear

lo

"it to be reasonable; and I am of opinion

that the condition to which I have

referred reasonable one and ought to

10

a

be imposed

IN

can

in

Case

every I think be

a matter of

small

small

hardship to the Company to

submit to this condition seeing that

as

they

the 2

27

th

rules of

themselves

say

in their letter of

ultimo they already adopt the

the Telegraph Convention,

throughout their eyelom

regardo

system.

Cables which have been

As

laid

the past of course the condition

carmel now be imposed, but for the future

Every Company should in

my

opinion be treated alike and be required to submit to

the condition

The Great Northern Company adhere to the

Convention & I am not aware that they claim

لو

to exclude any of their lines from the effect of

the adhesion.

I have, te,

P Henry Jewalt.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.